<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1732 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306101</link>
    <description>The appeal was filed against the assessment order for A.Y. 2006-07 involving transfer pricing issues. The appellant challenged the adjustment to the transfer price, selection of comparable companies, application of filters, inclusion of third-party sales, and the amended proviso to sec.92C(2). The DRP&#039;s order lacked reasoning, leading to setting aside the AO&#039;s order for fresh consideration after allowing the assessee to be heard. No decision on the merits was reached, and the appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. Other non-transfer pricing issues, including software expenses, deduction claims, and interest computations, were not adjudicated due to the primary focus on transfer pricing matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2023 21:17:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1732 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306101</link>
      <description>The appeal was filed against the assessment order for A.Y. 2006-07 involving transfer pricing issues. The appellant challenged the adjustment to the transfer price, selection of comparable companies, application of filters, inclusion of third-party sales, and the amended proviso to sec.92C(2). The DRP&#039;s order lacked reasoning, leading to setting aside the AO&#039;s order for fresh consideration after allowing the assessee to be heard. No decision on the merits was reached, and the appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. Other non-transfer pricing issues, including software expenses, deduction claims, and interest computations, were not adjudicated due to the primary focus on transfer pricing matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>