<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1415 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306106</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the Assessment Order, Demand Notice, and the DRP&#039;s Order. The matter was remitted back to the DRP for reconsideration in compliance with the law and provisions of the IT Act. The Assessing Officer was instructed to proceed and conclude the proceedings lawfully, emphasizing the importance of following statutory procedures and ensuring procedural fairness in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2023 21:17:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1415 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306106</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the Assessment Order, Demand Notice, and the DRP&#039;s Order. The matter was remitted back to the DRP for reconsideration in compliance with the law and provisions of the IT Act. The Assessing Officer was instructed to proceed and conclude the proceedings lawfully, emphasizing the importance of following statutory procedures and ensuring procedural fairness in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>