<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 518 - NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306100</link>
    <description>The commission found the bank liable for gross negligence and deficiency in service regarding a bank locker theft. The bank was directed to pay Rs. 17,51,489/- with 9% interest per annum from the complaint filing date. An additional Rs. 25,000/- was awarded for costs and mental distress suffered by the complainants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2023 15:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 518 - NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306100</link>
      <description>The commission found the bank liable for gross negligence and deficiency in service regarding a bank locker theft. The bank was directed to pay Rs. 17,51,489/- with 9% interest per annum from the complaint filing date. An additional Rs. 25,000/- was awarded for costs and mental distress suffered by the complainants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>