https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306098 The appeal was dismissed as the court ruled against the appellant on all three points. It found no violation of the principles of natural justice, as SEBI's actions were inquisitorial rather than adjudicatory. The court determined that SEBI did not exceed jurisdictional limits, as no specific constraints were set by the Division Bench, allowing SEBI to consider additional materials under its plenary powers. Additionally, the court concluded that SEBI properly applied its mind and met the requirements under Section 11C of the SEBI Act, basing its decision on relevant considerations and a direct nexus between the material and conclusions. en-us Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jan 2023 11:57:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306098 The appeal was dismissed as the court ruled against the appellant on all three points. It found no violation of the principles of natural justice, as SEBI's actions were inquisitorial rather than adjudicatory. The court determined that SEBI did not exceed jurisdictional limits, as no specific constraints were set by the Division Bench, allowing SEBI to consider additional materials under its plenary powers. Additionally, the court concluded that SEBI properly applied its mind and met the requirements under Section 11C of the SEBI Act, basing its decision on relevant considerations and a direct nexus between the material and conclusions. Case-Laws Law of Competition Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306098