<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 109 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31475</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, waiving the requirement for pre-deposit of service tax and penalties imposed. It found that the activities of the appellants did not qualify as services rendered by an Advertising Agency under the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal clarified that only services provided by an Advertisement Agency were taxable, not individual activities related to advertising. Legal precedents supported the appellants&#039; case, leading to a favorable outcome and a stay on the payment amount until the disposal of appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 109 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31475</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, waiving the requirement for pre-deposit of service tax and penalties imposed. It found that the activities of the appellants did not qualify as services rendered by an Advertising Agency under the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal clarified that only services provided by an Advertisement Agency were taxable, not individual activities related to advertising. Legal precedents supported the appellants&#039; case, leading to a favorable outcome and a stay on the payment amount until the disposal of appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>