<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 367 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432620</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, condoning the delay in filing the appeal and holding that the Assessing Officer exceeded jurisdiction in disallowing Rs. 7,54,700 under Section 40A(3) without converting limited scrutiny into complete scrutiny. The disallowance was deemed unsustainable, and the Tribunal emphasized legitimate deductions should be allowed even in cases of assessee error, citing relevant case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2023 15:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 367 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432620</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, condoning the delay in filing the appeal and holding that the Assessing Officer exceeded jurisdiction in disallowing Rs. 7,54,700 under Section 40A(3) without converting limited scrutiny into complete scrutiny. The disallowance was deemed unsustainable, and the Tribunal emphasized legitimate deductions should be allowed even in cases of assessee error, citing relevant case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>