<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds Broad Interpretation of &quot;Any&quot; in RBI Act Notification, Aligns with Legislative Intent and Scheme.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67594</link>
    <description>Demonetization - Scope of the term &quot;Any&quot; - Validity of N/N. 3407(E) dated 8th November 2016, issued by the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 26 of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Merely because on earlier two occasions the Government decided to take recourse to plenary power of legislation, this, by itself, cannot be a ground to give a restricted meaning to the word “any” in sub-section (2) of Section 26 of the RBI Act. As already discussed herein above, the legislative intent could not have been to give a restricted meaning to the word “any” in sub-section (2) of Section 26 of the RBI Act - we are unable to accept the contention that the word “any” has to be given a restricted meanin.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2023 09:23:24 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2023 09:23:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds Broad Interpretation of &quot;Any&quot; in RBI Act Notification, Aligns with Legislative Intent and Scheme.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67594</link>
      <description>Demonetization - Scope of the term &quot;Any&quot; - Validity of N/N. 3407(E) dated 8th November 2016, issued by the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 26 of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Merely because on earlier two occasions the Government decided to take recourse to plenary power of legislation, this, by itself, cannot be a ground to give a restricted meaning to the word “any” in sub-section (2) of Section 26 of the RBI Act. As already discussed herein above, the legislative intent could not have been to give a restricted meaning to the word “any” in sub-section (2) of Section 26 of the RBI Act - we are unable to accept the contention that the word “any” has to be given a restricted meanin.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2023 09:23:24 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>