<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 107 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31463</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that there was an error apparent on record in Final Order No. ST/26/08 dated 30-1-08 as it did not consider a crucial fact essential for the decision. Consequently, the Tribunal recalled the order, restored the appeal to its original number, and directed the Registry to list the appeal for further proceedings on 31-7-2008.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 107 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31463</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that there was an error apparent on record in Final Order No. ST/26/08 dated 30-1-08 as it did not consider a crucial fact essential for the decision. Consequently, the Tribunal recalled the order, restored the appeal to its original number, and directed the Registry to list the appeal for further proceedings on 31-7-2008.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>