https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31459 Service tax liability of a claimed sub-contractor was required to be reconsidered because Tribunal precedent indicated that a sub-contractor is not liable to pay service tax, and that contention had not been examined by the adjudicating authority. The CESTAT set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the Commissioner for a fresh decision based on the applicable ratio and the factual matrix. en-us Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31459 Service tax liability of a claimed sub-contractor was required to be reconsidered because Tribunal precedent indicated that a sub-contractor is not liable to pay service tax, and that contention had not been examined by the adjudicating authority. The CESTAT set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the Commissioner for a fresh decision based on the applicable ratio and the factual matrix. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31459