<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 295 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432548</link>
    <description>An incorporated members&#039; club supplying food and drinks to its own members was held not to make a taxable sale under the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 because the doctrine of mutuality prevents a transfer between distinct persons. The statutory definition of sale in Section 2(h) was read in light of the continuing authority of Young Men&#039;s Indian Association and Calcutta Club Limited, both of which confirm that mutuality applies to incorporated and unincorporated members&#039; clubs after the 46th Constitutional Amendment. Article 366(29-A)(f) was held not to apply to members&#039; clubs, so the assessment based on treating the supply as a sale could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2023 08:57:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 295 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432548</link>
      <description>An incorporated members&#039; club supplying food and drinks to its own members was held not to make a taxable sale under the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 because the doctrine of mutuality prevents a transfer between distinct persons. The statutory definition of sale in Section 2(h) was read in light of the continuing authority of Young Men&#039;s Indian Association and Calcutta Club Limited, both of which confirm that mutuality applies to incorporated and unincorporated members&#039; clubs after the 46th Constitutional Amendment. Article 366(29-A)(f) was held not to apply to members&#039; clubs, so the assessment based on treating the supply as a sale could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>