<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1609 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306070</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s order, denying the deduction under Sections 10A and 10B due to the failure to file mandatory forms 56F or 56G. The appeal by the revenue was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 26/04/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2023 20:15:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1609 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306070</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s order, denying the deduction under Sections 10A and 10B due to the failure to file mandatory forms 56F or 56G. The appeal by the revenue was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 26/04/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>