<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 105 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31456</link>
    <description>At the stay stage, the Tribunal found no prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit against service tax demand based on credit availed on tax allegedly paid by cable operators. It noted the appellant&#039;s revenue-neutrality argument but held that credit of service tax paid by the recipient of service as input service was not permissible on the material before it. As no sufficient basis for waiver was shown, the appellant was directed to deposit the disputed amount within eight weeks and the stay petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 105 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31456</link>
      <description>At the stay stage, the Tribunal found no prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit against service tax demand based on credit availed on tax allegedly paid by cable operators. It noted the appellant&#039;s revenue-neutrality argument but held that credit of service tax paid by the recipient of service as input service was not permissible on the material before it. As no sufficient basis for waiver was shown, the appellant was directed to deposit the disputed amount within eight weeks and the stay petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>