<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1308 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306081</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, directing the respondents to accept the petitioners&#039; declarations as valid and the balance disputed amounts within specified timelines, along with simple interest. The court emphasized the need to interpret the VSV Act liberally to achieve its purpose of reducing litigation, condoning the unintentional delay in payment due to extraordinary circumstances, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the death of a director.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2023 17:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1308 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306081</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, directing the respondents to accept the petitioners&#039; declarations as valid and the balance disputed amounts within specified timelines, along with simple interest. The court emphasized the need to interpret the VSV Act liberally to achieve its purpose of reducing litigation, condoning the unintentional delay in payment due to extraordinary circumstances, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the death of a director.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>