<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 1233 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306067</link>
    <description>Recognised aided and unaided private schools in Delhi were held under a continuing obligation to support inclusive elementary education for children with disabilities. The Court required schools to appoint Special Educators, or to train surplus staff where feasible, and to maintain readiness to admit children with special needs even if none were already enrolled. It also held that barrier-free access is a condition of recognition and that the cost of removing architectural barriers and making premises accessible must be borne by the schools, not reimbursed by the Government. The petition succeeded, and regulatory enforcement directions were issued to ensure compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2023 18:05:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 1233 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306067</link>
      <description>Recognised aided and unaided private schools in Delhi were held under a continuing obligation to support inclusive elementary education for children with disabilities. The Court required schools to appoint Special Educators, or to train surplus staff where feasible, and to maintain readiness to admit children with special needs even if none were already enrolled. It also held that barrier-free access is a condition of recognition and that the cost of removing architectural barriers and making premises accessible must be borne by the schools, not reimbursed by the Government. The petition succeeded, and regulatory enforcement directions were issued to ensure compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>