<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 1170 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306066</link>
    <description>The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 requires that a child&#039;s admission to a recognised Government school cannot be denied or delayed merely because a transfer certificate is not immediately produced; Rule 139 of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 was treated as a procedural safeguard, not an inconsistency with the Act, and provisional admission was required pending verification. For a child who had not previously attended a recognised school, the Head of School, in consultation with the Zonal Education Officer, could assess the appropriate class under Rule 141(2); admission was not confined to the class attended by children of the same age, since placement could be educationally suitable while special training is provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2023 17:41:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=701009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 1170 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306066</link>
      <description>The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 requires that a child&#039;s admission to a recognised Government school cannot be denied or delayed merely because a transfer certificate is not immediately produced; Rule 139 of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 was treated as a procedural safeguard, not an inconsistency with the Act, and provisional admission was required pending verification. For a child who had not previously attended a recognised school, the Head of School, in consultation with the Zonal Education Officer, could assess the appropriate class under Rule 141(2); admission was not confined to the class attended by children of the same age, since placement could be educationally suitable while special training is provided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>