<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 1029 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306063</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deduction of investment funding charges against dividend income, citing commercial expediency and the nature of the assessee&#039;s business. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law was raised, affirming the allowance of the expenditure as business expenditure under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2023 14:26:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 1029 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306063</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deduction of investment funding charges against dividend income, citing commercial expediency and the nature of the assessee&#039;s business. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law was raised, affirming the allowance of the expenditure as business expenditure under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>