<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 287 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, CHHATTISGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432540</link>
    <description>The AAR, Chhattisgarh ruled that corporations under government ministries cannot be generalized as Central/State Government entities but may qualify as governmental authorities or government entities subject to statutory conditions. For GST rate benefits under Notification 11/2017, all specified conditions must be fulfilled. The service recipient is determined by who is liable for payment consideration, or if no consideration exists, who receives or uses the goods/services. The AAR declined to classify specific entities outside Chhattisgarh&#039;s jurisdiction, stating such classification requires incorporation details and business information beyond the scope of advance rulings under Section 98 read with Section 97(2) of CGST Act, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 287 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, CHHATTISGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432540</link>
      <description>The AAR, Chhattisgarh ruled that corporations under government ministries cannot be generalized as Central/State Government entities but may qualify as governmental authorities or government entities subject to statutory conditions. For GST rate benefits under Notification 11/2017, all specified conditions must be fulfilled. The service recipient is determined by who is liable for payment consideration, or if no consideration exists, who receives or uses the goods/services. The AAR declined to classify specific entities outside Chhattisgarh&#039;s jurisdiction, stating such classification requires incorporation details and business information beyond the scope of advance rulings under Section 98 read with Section 97(2) of CGST Act, 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>