<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 268 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432521</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the assessee, finding merit in the contention that the agricultural income estimation was based on valid data and consistent with previous years. The Tribunal concluded that the Assessing Officer&#039;s estimation lacked a clear basis and supporting evidence. The addition of Rs.9,00,000 for both assessment years was deemed to be based on surmise without contrary findings and should be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2023 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 268 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432521</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the assessee, finding merit in the contention that the agricultural income estimation was based on valid data and consistent with previous years. The Tribunal concluded that the Assessing Officer&#039;s estimation lacked a clear basis and supporting evidence. The addition of Rs.9,00,000 for both assessment years was deemed to be based on surmise without contrary findings and should be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>