<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 264 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the decision in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of remuneration paid to the retiring partner. The judgment provided a comprehensive interpretation of the partnership deed, the provisions of section 40(b) of the IT Act, and the principles governing the calculation and allocation of partner remuneration in a partnership firm.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2023 17:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 264 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the decision in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of remuneration paid to the retiring partner. The judgment provided a comprehensive interpretation of the partnership deed, the provisions of section 40(b) of the IT Act, and the principles governing the calculation and allocation of partner remuneration in a partnership firm.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>