https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432510 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the rectificatory jurisdiction under Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013, is summary in nature and not intended for cases involving contested facts and disputed questions. The Court also held that violations of SEBI regulations must be adjudicated by SEBI, not the Tribunal, emphasizing the comprehensive regulatory framework provided by SEBI for such matters. en-us Wed, 04 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Jan 2023 15:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432510 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the rectificatory jurisdiction under Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013, is summary in nature and not intended for cases involving contested facts and disputed questions. The Court also held that violations of SEBI regulations must be adjudicated by SEBI, not the Tribunal, emphasizing the comprehensive regulatory framework provided by SEBI for such matters. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 04 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432510