<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1459 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306053</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the petition, quashing the respondent-Bank&#039;s actions to cancel the restructuring sanction letter and the subsequent notice under the SARFAESI Act. The sanction letter dated 30th March 2021 was held to be in operation, and the parties were directed to implement it at the earliest. The Court emphasized that the Bank&#039;s interpretation of the RBI circular was incorrect and that the restructuring was implemented by the issuance of the sanction letter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2023 08:47:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1459 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306053</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the petition, quashing the respondent-Bank&#039;s actions to cancel the restructuring sanction letter and the subsequent notice under the SARFAESI Act. The sanction letter dated 30th March 2021 was held to be in operation, and the parties were directed to implement it at the earliest. The Court emphasized that the Bank&#039;s interpretation of the RBI circular was incorrect and that the restructuring was implemented by the issuance of the sanction letter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>