<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1926 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306050</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed two criminal revision cases challenging orders under section 91 of the Cr.P.C. related to complaints of dishonored cheques. The court emphasized the need for the applicant to establish financial status through income tax returns, account books, and bank statements to prove lending a substantial amount. Failure to provide evidence may lead to the presumption that the cheques were not due to the applicant. As the applicant failed to demonstrate illegality or perversity in the trial court&#039;s order, the revisions were dismissed, affirming the orders of the lower court. The applicant was directed to submit an affidavit if the required documents do not exist.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2023 08:47:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1926 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306050</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed two criminal revision cases challenging orders under section 91 of the Cr.P.C. related to complaints of dishonored cheques. The court emphasized the need for the applicant to establish financial status through income tax returns, account books, and bank statements to prove lending a substantial amount. Failure to provide evidence may lead to the presumption that the cheques were not due to the applicant. As the applicant failed to demonstrate illegality or perversity in the trial court&#039;s order, the revisions were dismissed, affirming the orders of the lower court. The applicant was directed to submit an affidavit if the required documents do not exist.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>