https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306042 The court upheld the summoning order in a case where the petition sought to quash a criminal complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act. It was held that the trial court had complied with the mandatory requirements under Section 202 Cr. P.C. The court found the allegations against the petitioners, who were accused directors, sufficient for issuing summons. The petitioners were allowed to present evidence to prove their non-involvement in the company's management. One petitioner was granted exemption from personal appearance due to age and retired status. The petitions and pending applications were disposed of accordingly. en-us Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Jan 2023 14:41:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306042 The court upheld the summoning order in a case where the petition sought to quash a criminal complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act. It was held that the trial court had complied with the mandatory requirements under Section 202 Cr. P.C. The court found the allegations against the petitioners, who were accused directors, sufficient for issuing summons. The petitioners were allowed to present evidence to prove their non-involvement in the company's management. One petitioner was granted exemption from personal appearance due to age and retired status. The petitions and pending applications were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306042