<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 241 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432494</link>
    <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging GST goods seizure and penalty orders. Court found no e-way bill requirement was applicable on 13.03.2018 based on GST Council recommendation, rendering seizure and subsequent penalty orders invalid. The impugned orders dated 20.03.2021 and 01.07.2020 were set aside in favor of the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 12:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 241 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432494</link>
      <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging GST goods seizure and penalty orders. Court found no e-way bill requirement was applicable on 13.03.2018 based on GST Council recommendation, rendering seizure and subsequent penalty orders invalid. The impugned orders dated 20.03.2021 and 01.07.2020 were set aside in favor of the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>