<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 203 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432456</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the revisional jurisdiction under Section 263 by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, determining the assessment order as erroneous and prejudicial to revenue due to inadequate inquiries by the Assessing Officer. The appeal was dismissed, and the matter was remanded for further examination of forex gains and financial instruments, emphasizing the necessity of thorough scrutiny in assessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2023 09:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 203 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432456</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the revisional jurisdiction under Section 263 by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, determining the assessment order as erroneous and prejudicial to revenue due to inadequate inquiries by the Assessing Officer. The appeal was dismissed, and the matter was remanded for further examination of forex gains and financial instruments, emphasizing the necessity of thorough scrutiny in assessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>