<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 201 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432454</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer lacked valid jurisdiction under section 153C for the assessment year 2007-08 as the satisfaction note was beyond the limitation period. The notice issued was deemed legally invalid, resulting in the quashing of the notice and the assessment based on it. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Assessing Officer&#039;s order and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2023 11:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 201 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432454</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer lacked valid jurisdiction under section 153C for the assessment year 2007-08 as the satisfaction note was beyond the limitation period. The notice issued was deemed legally invalid, resulting in the quashing of the notice and the assessment based on it. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Assessing Officer&#039;s order and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>