<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 198 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432451</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s application for waiver of pre-deposit under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962, citing legal precedents that emphasized the mandatory nature of pre-deposit requirements. Following the amendment of Section 129E, the Tribunal clarified that it no longer had the discretion to waive the deposit, leading to the dismissal of the appeal due to the appellant&#039;s failure to fulfill the mandatory pre-deposit requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2023 09:32:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 198 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432451</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s application for waiver of pre-deposit under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962, citing legal precedents that emphasized the mandatory nature of pre-deposit requirements. Following the amendment of Section 129E, the Tribunal clarified that it no longer had the discretion to waive the deposit, leading to the dismissal of the appeal due to the appellant&#039;s failure to fulfill the mandatory pre-deposit requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>