https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432449 The court dismissed the petition, affirming the legitimacy of the Competition Commission of India's (CCI) order for investigation under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002. It upheld the CCI's directive as an administrative order, emphasizing its necessity to assess potential abuse of dominance by the petitioners' warranty policy. The court rejected the petitioners' reliance on precedent, the doctrine of res judicata, and concerns about business reputation, underscoring the investigation's role in safeguarding competition and consumer welfare. A cost of Rs. 10,00,000 was imposed on the petitioners to stress the importance of concluding the inquiry. en-us Tue, 23 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Jan 2023 18:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432449 The court dismissed the petition, affirming the legitimacy of the Competition Commission of India's (CCI) order for investigation under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002. It upheld the CCI's directive as an administrative order, emphasizing its necessity to assess potential abuse of dominance by the petitioners' warranty policy. The court rejected the petitioners' reliance on precedent, the doctrine of res judicata, and concerns about business reputation, underscoring the investigation's role in safeguarding competition and consumer welfare. A cost of Rs. 10,00,000 was imposed on the petitioners to stress the importance of concluding the inquiry. Case-Laws Law of Competition Tue, 23 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432449