https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306038 The HC directed the government authority to review and decide on the contractor's representations regarding GST reimbursement under CPWD contracts within three months. The contractor had challenged the calculation methodology introduced by a 2020 circular, claiming it contained significant errors affecting proper reimbursement under Clause 38 of the CPWD General Conditions of Contract. The court acknowledged the serious anomalies raised and ordered that the contractor be given an opportunity for hearing before a final decision, with specific attention to evaluating the correctness of the petitioner's calculation sheet. en-us Thu, 17 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Apr 2025 11:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306038 The HC directed the government authority to review and decide on the contractor's representations regarding GST reimbursement under CPWD contracts within three months. The contractor had challenged the calculation methodology introduced by a 2020 circular, claiming it contained significant errors affecting proper reimbursement under Clause 38 of the CPWD General Conditions of Contract. The court acknowledged the serious anomalies raised and ordered that the contractor be given an opportunity for hearing before a final decision, with specific attention to evaluating the correctness of the petitioner's calculation sheet. Case-Laws GST Thu, 17 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306038