https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306039 School leaving records may be admissible, but they prove age only when their authenticity and the source of the date of birth are duly established. Here, the plaintiff failed to prove the certificate through a competent witness or show that the photocopy was a certified public document, so it did not establish minority or invalidate the registered release deed. The commentary also restates that in second appeal, interference with concurrent findings of fact is confined to substantial questions of law and is not justified unless the findings are perverse, based on no evidence, or contrary to law; the High Court's reappreciation of evidence was therefore improper. en-us Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Jan 2023 09:31:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306039 School leaving records may be admissible, but they prove age only when their authenticity and the source of the date of birth are duly established. Here, the plaintiff failed to prove the certificate through a competent witness or show that the photocopy was a certified public document, so it did not establish minority or invalidate the registered release deed. The commentary also restates that in second appeal, interference with concurrent findings of fact is confined to substantial questions of law and is not justified unless the findings are perverse, based on no evidence, or contrary to law; the High Court's reappreciation of evidence was therefore improper. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306039