https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306015 A property was treated as wakf where the sale deed recitals showed an original dedication by Sultanji for the benefit of the Muslim community, with management rights reserved to him, and the dedication was for a purpose recognised as pious, religious or charitable under Muslim law; the plaintiff society's registration did not change that character. In second appeal, the High Court could not disturb concurrent findings of fact unless a substantial question of law arose or the findings were perverse or unsupported by evidence. The concurrent factual findings were therefore impermissibly reversed. en-us Tue, 10 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Jan 2023 12:26:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306015 A property was treated as wakf where the sale deed recitals showed an original dedication by Sultanji for the benefit of the Muslim community, with management rights reserved to him, and the dedication was for a purpose recognised as pious, religious or charitable under Muslim law; the plaintiff society's registration did not change that character. In second appeal, the High Court could not disturb concurrent findings of fact unless a substantial question of law arose or the findings were perverse or unsupported by evidence. The concurrent factual findings were therefore impermissibly reversed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306015