<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 179 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432432</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s orders under Section 263, finding the assessment orders erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. The appellants&#039; contentions were dismissed, emphasizing the importance of proper valuation and genuine transactions to prevent revenue prejudice. The appeals were rejected, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the Income Tax Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 179 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432432</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s orders under Section 263, finding the assessment orders erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. The appellants&#039; contentions were dismissed, emphasizing the importance of proper valuation and genuine transactions to prevent revenue prejudice. The appeals were rejected, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the Income Tax Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>