<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 96 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31427</link>
    <description>In-mine movement of unpacked limestone, involving loading, internal transportation and unloading within a limestone mining area, was treated as prima facie outside cargo handling service. The appellants relied on Tribunal rulings supporting that view, and the Revenue&#039;s circular was found inconsistent with those rulings at the interim stage. On that basis, the appellants established a sufficient case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of the service tax demand and penalties, and interim relief was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 96 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31427</link>
      <description>In-mine movement of unpacked limestone, involving loading, internal transportation and unloading within a limestone mining area, was treated as prima facie outside cargo handling service. The appellants relied on Tribunal rulings supporting that view, and the Revenue&#039;s circular was found inconsistent with those rulings at the interim stage. On that basis, the appellants established a sufficient case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of the service tax demand and penalties, and interim relief was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>