https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432407 The Court upheld the rejection of the petitioner's application seeking quashment of the order in Criminal Case No. SC/128/2016, emphasizing the petitioner's required presence in the proceedings. It dismissed the plea to quash the criminal proceedings, determining the petitioner's liability as a Director with knowledge of the company's activities. The Court clarified the jurisdiction of the Special Court under the Companies Act, 2013, and found the petitioner fell within the scope of liability under relevant sections. The petition was dismissed, emphasizing that the petitioner's status and liability would be determined during trial without influencing the proceedings. en-us Wed, 07 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Jan 2023 08:25:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432407 The Court upheld the rejection of the petitioner's application seeking quashment of the order in Criminal Case No. SC/128/2016, emphasizing the petitioner's required presence in the proceedings. It dismissed the plea to quash the criminal proceedings, determining the petitioner's liability as a Director with knowledge of the company's activities. The Court clarified the jurisdiction of the Special Court under the Companies Act, 2013, and found the petitioner fell within the scope of liability under relevant sections. The petition was dismissed, emphasizing that the petitioner's status and liability would be determined during trial without influencing the proceedings. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 07 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432407