https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306008 Article 212 protects only procedural irregularities in legislative proceedings; it does not bar review where the impugned action is alleged to be substantively illegal or unconstitutional. The text also states that a long-standing and constitutionally compatible practice of appointing an opposition member as Chairman of the Committee on Public Accounts may crystallise into an enforceable constitutional convention. It further explains that the Chairmanship can be treated as a public office for quo warranto where eligibility is in doubt, and that a petition raising constitutional issues about disqualification and legislative appointment may be maintainable as a public interest petition. en-us Tue, 28 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Jan 2023 08:24:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306008 Article 212 protects only procedural irregularities in legislative proceedings; it does not bar review where the impugned action is alleged to be substantively illegal or unconstitutional. The text also states that a long-standing and constitutionally compatible practice of appointing an opposition member as Chairman of the Committee on Public Accounts may crystallise into an enforceable constitutional convention. It further explains that the Chairmanship can be treated as a public office for quo warranto where eligibility is in doubt, and that a petition raising constitutional issues about disqualification and legislative appointment may be maintainable as a public interest petition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306008