<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 922 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306001</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court overturned the Punjab and Haryana High Court&#039;s decision to grant promotional increments to J.B.T. teachers promoted to Headmaster, who had already received a higher pay scale before promotion. The Court emphasized that regular promotion to Masters did not warrant an additional increment. The case was remitted to the High Court for reconsideration based on the legal principles outlined, with instructions to promptly resolve the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2023 14:23:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 922 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306001</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court overturned the Punjab and Haryana High Court&#039;s decision to grant promotional increments to J.B.T. teachers promoted to Headmaster, who had already received a higher pay scale before promotion. The Court emphasized that regular promotion to Masters did not warrant an additional increment. The case was remitted to the High Court for reconsideration based on the legal principles outlined, with instructions to promptly resolve the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>