<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 140 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432393</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the petitioner&#039;s challenge to GST payment above the tender amount. After examining the bid schedule and tender documents, the court found no irregularity in the respondents&#039; demand for 18% GST on the tender amount. The petition was rejected, with each party directed to bear their own costs, affirming the validity of the GST calculation in the e-tender process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 13:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 140 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432393</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the petitioner&#039;s challenge to GST payment above the tender amount. After examining the bid schedule and tender documents, the court found no irregularity in the respondents&#039; demand for 18% GST on the tender amount. The petition was rejected, with each party directed to bear their own costs, affirming the validity of the GST calculation in the e-tender process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>