https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432387 The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that the delay in appearance by the respondents was not justified as a Ministry of Finance notification had already been issued. The Court held that the appellant was entitled to relief under the Income Declaration Scheme of 2016, and as the amount had been deposited in court with interest, it should be remitted to the respondents. The Court declined the respondents' request for further time, stating that no additional instructions were necessary due to the notification. The civil appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant as per the judgment. en-us Wed, 18 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Jun 2023 10:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432387 The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that the delay in appearance by the respondents was not justified as a Ministry of Finance notification had already been issued. The Court held that the appellant was entitled to relief under the Income Declaration Scheme of 2016, and as the amount had been deposited in court with interest, it should be remitted to the respondents. The Court declined the respondents' request for further time, stating that no additional instructions were necessary due to the notification. The civil appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant as per the judgment. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 18 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432387