<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 109 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432362</link>
    <description>The Adjudicating Authority upheld the impugned order directing the Committee of Creditors to consider the Resolution Plan of the Third Respondent in a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process matter. Disputes arose over the appointment of a Resolution Professional and selection of a successful bidder, with concerns of fraudulent conduct and coalition between Group businesses. The judgment highlighted disagreements within the Adjudicating Authority and addressed challenges to decisions in Committee of Creditors meetings. The Appellant&#039;s appeal for judicial review was granted, allowing the raising of defenses and grievances related to the order and decisions made. The Supreme Court dismissed a challenge to certain sections of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2023 08:28:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 109 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432362</link>
      <description>The Adjudicating Authority upheld the impugned order directing the Committee of Creditors to consider the Resolution Plan of the Third Respondent in a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process matter. Disputes arose over the appointment of a Resolution Professional and selection of a successful bidder, with concerns of fraudulent conduct and coalition between Group businesses. The judgment highlighted disagreements within the Adjudicating Authority and addressed challenges to decisions in Committee of Creditors meetings. The Appellant&#039;s appeal for judicial review was granted, allowing the raising of defenses and grievances related to the order and decisions made. The Supreme Court dismissed a challenge to certain sections of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>