<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 108 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432361</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, affirming the Principal Commissioner&#039;s decision to drop the show cause notice. The Tribunal held that revenue-sharing arrangements in joint ventures do not constitute taxable services under the Finance Act, as established by previous judgments. The decision was based on the finding that no service provider-recipient relationship existed in such arrangements, leading to the conclusion that no service tax was leviable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2023 08:28:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 108 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432361</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, affirming the Principal Commissioner&#039;s decision to drop the show cause notice. The Tribunal held that revenue-sharing arrangements in joint ventures do not constitute taxable services under the Finance Act, as established by previous judgments. The decision was based on the finding that no service provider-recipient relationship existed in such arrangements, leading to the conclusion that no service tax was leviable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>