<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 184 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31414</link>
    <description>Service charges received for rendering services during the warranty period were examined as potential consideration for a taxable service, and the matter also concerned whether pre-deposit should be waived pending appeal. The Tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit till disposal of the appeal, leaving the substantive tax classification issue to be dealt with in the appeal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 184 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31414</link>
      <description>Service charges received for rendering services during the warranty period were examined as potential consideration for a taxable service, and the matter also concerned whether pre-deposit should be waived pending appeal. The Tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit till disposal of the appeal, leaving the substantive tax classification issue to be dealt with in the appeal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>