<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1319 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305992</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC declined to exercise writ jurisdiction under Article 226 after considering the petition and affidavit in reply, and dismissed the petition. The order does not record any substantive adjudication on the underlying income-tax controversy, only the court&#039;s refusal to intervene on the petition as presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2023 21:14:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1319 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305992</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC declined to exercise writ jurisdiction under Article 226 after considering the petition and affidavit in reply, and dismissed the petition. The order does not record any substantive adjudication on the underlying income-tax controversy, only the court&#039;s refusal to intervene on the petition as presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>