<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1398 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305991</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ appeals filed by the appellants, affirming the Competition Commission of India&#039;s (CCI) order for an investigation under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002. It concluded that the CCI acted within its jurisdiction based on prima facie information and that the appellants were required to participate in the investigation process. The court found no merit in the appellants&#039; claims concerning the necessity of prior notice, potential impact on business reputation, or the legality of the CCI&#039;s order, emphasizing that the order was administrative and did not determine any rights or obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2023 21:14:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1398 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305991</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ appeals filed by the appellants, affirming the Competition Commission of India&#039;s (CCI) order for an investigation under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002. It concluded that the CCI acted within its jurisdiction based on prima facie information and that the appellants were required to participate in the investigation process. The court found no merit in the appellants&#039; claims concerning the necessity of prior notice, potential impact on business reputation, or the legality of the CCI&#039;s order, emphasizing that the order was administrative and did not determine any rights or obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>