https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305981 Article 32 is available to enforce a person's own fundamental rights, and a stranger to a criminal prosecution cannot use it to challenge a concluded conviction and sentence. The text explains that, unless the petitioner is authorised by the convicts or acts as a legally recognised proxy for a disabled aggrieved person, an unrelated third party has no locus standi to question final criminal adjudications. It further notes that allowing such challenges would undermine finality in criminal proceedings and permit strangers to litigate on behalf of persons who may choose not to contest the result. en-us Wed, 16 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Jan 2023 14:17:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305981 Article 32 is available to enforce a person's own fundamental rights, and a stranger to a criminal prosecution cannot use it to challenge a concluded conviction and sentence. The text explains that, unless the petitioner is authorised by the convicts or acts as a legally recognised proxy for a disabled aggrieved person, an unrelated third party has no locus standi to question final criminal adjudications. It further notes that allowing such challenges would undermine finality in criminal proceedings and permit strangers to litigate on behalf of persons who may choose not to contest the result. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305981