https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305981 The Supreme Court held that a third-party petitioner lacked 'locus standi' to challenge the conviction and sentence of two accused individuals in a case involving the assassination of General Vaidya. The Court emphasized that only the aggrieved party affected by an order has the right to seek redress, rejecting the petitioner's contentions regarding jurisdiction and constitutional validity. This decision clarifies restrictions on third-party interventions in criminal cases, highlighting that only directly affected parties can challenge judicial decisions. en-us Wed, 16 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Jan 2023 14:17:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305981 The Supreme Court held that a third-party petitioner lacked 'locus standi' to challenge the conviction and sentence of two accused individuals in a case involving the assassination of General Vaidya. The Court emphasized that only the aggrieved party affected by an order has the right to seek redress, rejecting the petitioner's contentions regarding jurisdiction and constitutional validity. This decision clarifies restrictions on third-party interventions in criminal cases, highlighting that only directly affected parties can challenge judicial decisions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305981