<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 12 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31409</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reverse the additions made on account of disallowance of commission and service charges paid to a related entity. The Court found that the commission paid for services rendered should be allowed at the agreed rate when the fact of services being provided is established. It was noted that the Assessing Officer had accepted the services rendered and allowed the commission at the rate of 15%. The Court concluded that no substantial question of law arose in the appeal and dismissed it accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 12 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31409</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reverse the additions made on account of disallowance of commission and service charges paid to a related entity. The Court found that the commission paid for services rendered should be allowed at the agreed rate when the fact of services being provided is established. It was noted that the Assessing Officer had accepted the services rendered and allowed the commission at the rate of 15%. The Court concluded that no substantial question of law arose in the appeal and dismissed it accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>