<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 61 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432314</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Petitioner, quashing the notices from 2015 and upholding the challenge against the show cause notice from 1997 due to significant delay of 25 years, finding it unjustified and not in line with administrative discipline. The Respondents were restrained from enforcing the 1997 notice, emphasizing the importance of timely administrative actions and preventing prejudice to parties involved in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2023 12:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 61 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432314</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Petitioner, quashing the notices from 2015 and upholding the challenge against the show cause notice from 1997 due to significant delay of 25 years, finding it unjustified and not in line with administrative discipline. The Respondents were restrained from enforcing the 1997 notice, emphasizing the importance of timely administrative actions and preventing prejudice to parties involved in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>