<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 60 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432313</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the revocation of the license for M/s Sonak Shipping Services but upheld the forfeiture of the security deposit and penalty under the Customs Broker Licensing Regulation, 2018. The tribunal found that while there was no requirement for physical visits to the client&#039;s premises, familiarity with the client&#039;s background was necessary. The decision was made on 22.12.2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2023 08:22:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 60 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432313</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the revocation of the license for M/s Sonak Shipping Services but upheld the forfeiture of the security deposit and penalty under the Customs Broker Licensing Regulation, 2018. The tribunal found that while there was no requirement for physical visits to the client&#039;s premises, familiarity with the client&#039;s background was necessary. The decision was made on 22.12.2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>