<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 58 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432311</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petitions challenging the Competition Commission of India&#039;s (CCI) order under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002, which directed an investigation into alleged anti-competitive practices. It held that the order was administrative, based on a prima facie view, and did not violate statutory provisions. The court affirmed that the CCI need not provide a hearing at this stage and that judicial review of such orders is limited. The petitioners can present their case during the investigation and subsequent proceedings. The court stayed penalty proceedings by the Director General until the petitioners respond to the notices issued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2023 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 58 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432311</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petitions challenging the Competition Commission of India&#039;s (CCI) order under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002, which directed an investigation into alleged anti-competitive practices. It held that the order was administrative, based on a prima facie view, and did not violate statutory provisions. The court affirmed that the CCI need not provide a hearing at this stage and that judicial review of such orders is limited. The petitioners can present their case during the investigation and subsequent proceedings. The court stayed penalty proceedings by the Director General until the petitioners respond to the notices issued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>