<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 54 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432307</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on services used during setting up of a factory must be tested against the main definition of input service read harmoniously with the post-2011 exclusions. Services used directly or indirectly in relation to manufacture may remain eligible, but construction and works contract services used for construction of a building or civil structure fall within the specific exclusion and are not admissible. The claim therefore requires service-wise factual verification. The commentary also notes that denial of credit under Rule 4(7) cannot be sustained without examining the assessee&#039;s defence that credit was taken within the prescribed period and reflected in ST-3 returns; that objection requires fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2023 15:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 54 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432307</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on services used during setting up of a factory must be tested against the main definition of input service read harmoniously with the post-2011 exclusions. Services used directly or indirectly in relation to manufacture may remain eligible, but construction and works contract services used for construction of a building or civil structure fall within the specific exclusion and are not admissible. The claim therefore requires service-wise factual verification. The commentary also notes that denial of credit under Rule 4(7) cannot be sustained without examining the assessee&#039;s defence that credit was taken within the prescribed period and reflected in ST-3 returns; that objection requires fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>