<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1365 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305978</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues. It held that receipts from software distribution are not royalty, Adobe India is not a dependent agent PE, no additional profits need to be attributed to the PE, Adobe Ireland does not have a fixed place PE in India, and interest under Section 234B should not be levied. The assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2023 21:14:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1365 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305978</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues. It held that receipts from software distribution are not royalty, Adobe India is not a dependent agent PE, no additional profits need to be attributed to the PE, Adobe Ireland does not have a fixed place PE in India, and interest under Section 234B should not be levied. The assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>